The Nexus Of Evil : Part Three.

(A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity.)

By Philip Jones 28th July 2009.


The Role of Intellect In An Age Of Conflict:

We will now look at the role played by Western `Intellectual thought` in the `Nexus Of Evil` and identify it's manipulation and exploitation, it's base in the occult, and the role it has subsequently played in in the furthering of the Illuminati's Luciferian Agenda. In order to do so, we must now turn to and briefly examine the fundamental changes which occurred during the latter half of the 17th century onwards, in the realm of Western intellect, which can be regarded as one of the main causes of our age of conflict – it being the other half of that aforementioned `alliance of money and intellect,` acting in the service of the forces of magic, and by that, I mean the Illuminati and ultimately Lucifer himself.

In my series, `Who Rules The World,` I wrote; “I personally do not believe that human beings, who in the majority, long for peace and happiness, are capable in themselves of such gross wickedness. What force drives men to such loathsome deeds, or manoeuvres them into situations, where they feel compelled to commit such atrocities? Like many today involved in this area of investigation, it is my contention that there is lurking in the shadows, behind the scenes, some purely wicked, invisible power which is, through its agents and disciples, manipulating, coercing and influencing people to commit terrible acts of treachery, violence, perversion, and what can only be termed unadulterated evil. If one steps outside the `Matrix,` and considers the `bigger picture,` this pandemic evil can be seen as being anything but a collection of random unconnected incidents and occurrences. To the contrary, it appears to be a driven, systematic, controlled, and malevolent agenda, manipulating the course of world events towards a defined `end game.”

In the three articles which comprise that series, and which for the sake of continuity should be read as a precursor to this current collection, I introduced the hypothesis that the ills of humankind are and have always been the work of Lucifer, his `Fallen Angels,` and subsequently, the Illuminati `Bloodline` hybrid beings, who now through their control of all the `seats` of global power, are preparing their final `Coup d' Etat` on mankind. In this current series of articles, we will deal with the `nuts and bolts` of the conspiracy to dethrone God, subjugate and degrade humanity, and enthrone Lucifer as `Lord Of This World.`

It is necessary to understand that the creation and eventual propagation of the secular humanist ideals we will be dealing with in the following paragraphs, were never intended by the Luciferians as an end in themselves, but rather as an interim means of breaking down, and tearing out from the hearts of Western men and women, their love of God, and replacing it with an eventual adoration of Lucifer. In it's final stages, this development can be seen to have begun more than two centuries ago and to have been a major contributing factor in the decline of Christianity as the consensus religion of the West.

The `new` thought process and values system inaugurated as a result of the decline of the influence of Christian orthodoxy came to be known as socialism. Socialism was however, only one of the symptoms of something with a much more profound metaphysical implication; a condition better represented by the words `idealism` and `humanism.` Socialism is, in truth, a form of economic and political idealism.

It is this `idealism` and the reality of the forces behind it which we need to understand. A pre-fabricated attitude to human existence that responds readily to any plausible system or ideology, ostensibly proposing one or another program, which on the surface, usually appears to be intended towards the form of a utopian betterment of the world and mankind, but which in essence, only serves the Luciferian agenda.

Such ideologies have included anarchism, nihilism, syndicalism, socialism, communism, etc. This idealism supplies the base psychic foundation for a false system of secular belief which acquires the force and intensity of the religion which it has replaced. There is a fundamental and most important difference between 1) A metaphysical or religious system of belief, and  2) A secular or humanist system of belief. These differences can be thus defined as:

1] All the great religions which have endured down the through the ages, however different in their orthodoxies are founded on the central belief that human existence, like everything else in the universe, is governed by immutable laws of cause and effect which the intelligence must discover and obey. What this amounts to is a recognition that human freedom finds fulfilment only as Freedom Under Law. We are free to do as we please but, if we are to avoid the disappointment of our hopes and expectations, if we are to preserve psychic health, we must first find out what can and what cannot be done.

2] In The Bible Book of Genesis, the seduction of Eve by Lucifer/Satan is enacted thus: 1]Now the serpent was more crafty than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, "Indeed, has God said, 'You shall not eat from any tree of the garden'?" 2]The woman said to the serpent, "From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat; 3]but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, 'You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.'" 4]The serpent said to the woman, "You surely will not die! 5]"For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

Taking the above into consideration, it is no coincidence that fundamental to idealism or humanism is the idea that the human intellect is fully qualified to be a law unto itself in promoting purposes which can be visualized or imagined.. The element of error in this perception of the intellect as being the highest source of guidance in human affairs is extremely subtle, very difficult to detect, and even more so to explain; it can be compared with a compass deflection in navigation which progressively falsifies all positional and directional calculations. The ancients called it `Hubris,` an attitude that presupposes that the intellect can conquer life itself as it can conquer the human environment. Milton handles this most profound theme in the language of symbolism in his great epic poem `Paradise Lost.`

The Magicians:

It was the mysterious `Count Cagliostro who had been primarily responsible for the incorporation of `magic` into the Masonic Rite of Mizraim. Napoleon Bonaparte's `Grande Armee,` with its initiates of the Philalethes, Asiatic Brothers, and Martinists, then carried Cagliostro’s Masons to Egypt, whereby they came in contact with the Grand Lodge of the Ismailis, established in the eleventh century, and known in the occult world, as the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.

The enigmatic Comte St. Germain was reputedly the Grand Master of all Freemasonry at the time, and is said to have initiated Cagliostro into the mysteries of Egyptian Freemasonry. Samuel Honis a native Egyptian, brought the Egyptian Rite to France, and in 1815, the lodge, `Les Disciples de Memphis,` was founded by Honis, Marconis de Negre and others.

It soon attracted a large number of Frankists and some of its initiates (of which Karl Marx was one), became involved in a number of subversive movements. Marx, moved to Brussels in 1845, and together with Friedrich Engels, reorganized the Communist League. The League having evolved from the revolutionary French Jacobins, which themselves had been originally founded by the Bavarian Illuminati.

In 1848, Marx published his Communist Manifesto, in which he borrows heavily from Clinton Roosevelt’s, `The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law,` that echoed entirely the philosophies of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati.

In `To Eliminate the Opiate,` Rabbi Antelman affirmed that Marx, far from being an atheist was, like his father a Shabbatean Frankist. Paul Johnson in his work the `History of the Jews,` indicates that Marx’s theory of history, closely resembled the Kabbalistic theories of the Messianic Age of Shabbatai Zevi’s mentor, Nathan of Gaza. Marx derived his philosophy of history from the Lurianic Kabbalah, through the influence of Hegel. Like Hegel, Marx believed that the world develops according to a dialectical formula, but he disagreed with Hegel as to the motive force of this development. Hegel believed in a mystical entity called Spirit. For Marx, it was matter, not spirit.

The Blueprint:

In 1870, Giuseppe Mazzini, Lord Palmerston of England, Otto Von Bismarck of Germany and Albert Pike, each a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason, inaugurated the supreme and universal rite of Freemasonry, that henceforth, would centralise all the high Masonic bodies throughout the world under one head. To this end the Palladium Rite was created as the pinnacle of the pyramid of power: an international alliance to bring in the Grand Lodges, the Grand Orient, the ninety-seven degrees of Memphis and Mizraim of Cagliostro, and the Scottish Rite.

In a letter written to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871, Albert Pike graphically outlined plans for three world wars, that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order. As I have covered this previously at length in the series, To Kill A Tree , it will suffice to say here that the two fratricidal world wars of the 20th century went entirely
according to script, and that Pike's letter predicted that the third global war would have to be fought against Islam.

This was in effect the blueprint for the `Clash Of Civilisations, `scenario now being played out in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine.
Pike then told Mazzini that, after World War Three had ended, a global social cataclysm will be provoked that will be greater than the world has ever known:

We shall unleash the Nihilists [meaning terrorists] and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”
Mikhail Bakunin:

The political philosophy of Nihilism, originally devised by Kabbalists, Shabbetai Zevi, Jacob Frank and the Frankists, was further developed by Mikhail Bakunin. Bakunin was a Grand Orient Freemason, a disciple of Weishaupt, and like Marx, an avowed Satanist. Bakunin left Russia in 1842 and moved to Paris where he met Marx. He participated in the 1848 French Revolution, and then moved to Germany where he called for the overthrow of the Habsburg Empire.

The most notable episode of Bakunin’s later years was his quarrel with Marx. While living in Geneva in 1868, he joined the socialist First International. At the same time, however, he enrolled his followers in a semi-secret Social Democratic Alliance, which had a direct affiliation to the Illuminati, and which he conceived as a revolutionary avant-garde within the International. The First International was opposed to Bakunin’s activities, and at a congress in 1872 at The Hague, Marx secured the expulsion of Bakunin and his followers from the International. The resulting split in the revolutionary movement in Europe and the United States persisted for many years.

In the first meeting of Social Democratic Alliance, Bakunin, though a Magician and Satanist, openly professed atheism, and called for the Illuminati goals of the abolition of marriage, property, and of all social and religious institutions. Nihilism (like Satanism and the Kabbalah) rejected all religious (read Christian Godly) and political authority, social traditions, and traditional morality as standing in opposition to `freedom.` Every nation thus became the enemy, and the enemy was ferociously attacked using terrorism and assassination. Reflecting the dictum of Weishaupt, Bakunin sought, “the unchaining of what is today called the evil passions and the destruction of what is called public order,” and made the declaration, still identified with nihilism: “Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!”

It is vital for the reader to understand that Atheism, Humanism and Idealism were cynical constructs of the Luciferian Magicians, and only that. Used to break down Christianity, they were the means to a Luciferian end, as opposed to `bona fide` means in themselves. The whole secular humanist movement is a cloak for Luciferinaism, and whilst most of its disciples were and still are unaware of it, the elite `provocateurs` knew it then as the do now.

The New Idealists:

The almost irresistible attraction of socialism for those members of the utopia orientated `educated` classes, who in the nineteenth century, found themselves without the support of their ancestral Christian faith is, therefore, at least understandable, for it provided them with a highly plausible and ingeniously elaborate framework of ideas, which paradoxically (considering their Satanic origin) purported to be able to solve many, if not all of the world's evils, and to finally bring those ever so elusive elements of human existence, happiness and contentment to all of mankind. It offered to the educated individual a laudable ambition and an integrated intellectual frame of reference, which promised to infuse his existence with new meaning and purpose. Yet it is precisely this very idealism, this attitude and this `plausible` thinking, which has given our world over a hundred years of terrible conflict and tragedy which is without precedent in all of recorded history.

No manner of evil intentions in all of history, ever produced cruelty and disorder on so vast a scale as idealism or humanism have produced since the beginning of the 20th century. Supposed good intentions in the service of evil have been exposed by the experience of that history as being capable of producing the most dreadful of consequences. It is in this area of conduct where ends are called on to justify means, that the human mind makes mistakes of a kind that the mind itself can not easily understand, and it is where the mind is most exposed to the influences of the most hostile cunning, emanating from the ultimate master of hostility and cunning.

The great mistake is to suppose that the means used can be justified by the quality of the ends proposed, when in fact, as experience may only demonstrate belatedly, it is only the actual results produced that can ever justify the means. The idea that the laudable end envisioned, however distantly separated from the present, justifies the employment of whatever means are required for its attainment, is thus fundamental to idealism or humanism in whatever form it may take, whether as socialism or as that benevolent imperialism preached by John Ruskin, and which so captivated the mind of the young Cecil Rhodes.

An example of the above can be seen in the Illuminati's current and markedly accelerating drive towards the `New World Order, ` there are undoubtedly many working unwittingly and naively towards what they consider to be `laudable ends,` having no idea that they are furthering a Totalitarian Luciferian Agenda.

Political idealism in action exhibits two major negative aspects: it undertakes long-term enterprises which are incapable of actualisation because it finds itself in conflict with unalterable requirements of human nature as expressed in instinct, and it produces among its `believers` a progressive blunting or description of what, for want of a more precise description, we can call `a sense of evil.` In other words, immoral behaviour in the service of an ideal is condoned and even recommended, and any suffering that ensues is habitually regarded with indifference as part of the price that must be paid for `progress.`

Socialism As A Substitute:

After a long period of incubation in Germany and central Europe during the early part of the 19th century, Socialism was accorded more scholarly credentials in the form of `dialectical materialism,` defined as a materialistic interpretation of existence, by Karl Marx, which was later to be presented in a more delusive and acceptable form by leading British intellectuals, such as Edward Pease, George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb. The Fabian Society and later the London School of Economics (LSE) were then set up as nurseries for the future proliferation of socialist ideas and ideals throughout the English speaking world, and particularly the United States.

It is significant to our story, that Julius Wernher, of the same Wernher-Beit conglomerate that supported Milner's effort to precipitate the Anglo-Boer War, contributed substantially to the funding of the LSE, and socialist movements wherever they may have been, all vehemently `anti-capitalist,` somewhat bewilderingly to the `uninitiated,` received massive support from the most powerful `capitalists.`

It was because of the absence of any fundamental antagonism between the philosophies of John Ruskin and of Karl Marx, that it was possible for the `Brave New World` ambition, so actively promoted by Rhodes and his heirs, to be absorbed into the socialist world-power vortex with hardly a sign that anything untoward had happened. In fact, the international socialists, instruments of the most highly concentrated financial power, were able to take over the Rhodes-Milner establishment, complete with its worldwide network of organizations - the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilaterals, etc - and continue to run it as if still under its original management; indeed, it simply gave the socialists a new Dimension for the exercise of their incomparable skill in the arts of deception.

The headlong decay of Christianity in its orthodox forms, and particularly in its institutionalised form as the `established` Church, proved to be overwhelmingly to the advantage of the new order of financiers. For many centuries in the West, Christian orthodoxy or Christendom, had been more than just something to believe in; it had become the world view of a whole civilisation, an interpretation of the totality of existence and, as such, the very medium in which men's minds perceived reality, in the same way as the open blue skies are the medium by which birds fulfil their existence.

As that `reality` faded, the `shadow power` determined that the educated classes in the west would need a new religion, or even better, a secular substitute, one fully in harmony with the new rationalist climate of thought engendered by a triumphant if often erroneous science (as in Darwinism). This substitute appeared in the form of socialism, an intellectual frame of reference and system of values which has continued to dominate higher education in the West since the beginning of the 20th century, especially in academic disciplines like history, anthropology, sociology and political science.

Socialism can be seen to have two separate and different realities:

1] It is something that can be believed; and

2] It is something that can be used.

Spengler recognised socialism's double character when he remarked that every proletarian movement, even a communist one, "Operates in the interest of money" adding significantly "without the idealist in its ranks having the slightest suspicion of the fact."

The damaging effect of socialism as an intellectual frame of reference, can be ascribed to the fact that it is basically a `con trick,` one component of a dialectical trap with money that funds socialism as Thesis, a socialism in which men believe in as Antithesis and `The New Money Imperium, or New World Order" as Synthesis. Money grabs and concentrates power into the centre, and socialism promises the ultimate redistribution of ownership and power; the resolution of this contradiction supplies the New Imperium or New World Order, with an almost irresistible dynamic.

The New Imperium:

But the question remains; why should such an alliance of money and intellect, albeit in the service of darkly magical forces, all ostensibly bent on restructuring the world and reducing it to to a `New Order` have produced since the 20th century so much more conflict than was seen previously, when the major nations of Europe were greedily engaged in a competitive scramble for aggrandizement, particularly in the great land grab for colonial possessions? It would appear that money and intellect as determinants in the shaping of history, had experienced a radical change to the detriment of humankind, giving rise, among other negative phenomena, to what Professor P.T. Bauer has described as "an undeclared, one sided, fratricidal civil war in the West."

The shadow money power, being alien in philosophy, religion and method to the West, and unable to flourish in an environment of national health, strength and order, therefore committed itself to promoting and funding policies of destruction, degeneration, deprivation and degradation. Where there is social health, strength and goodly order, in any part of the world, there is a resulting self determination, and that is an intolerable obstacle to the money's global power-concentrating purposes. Such an alien money power needs a world of ethnic communities reduced to a condition of arrested cultural and political development, and has up until very recently concentrated its enmity exclusively on Western civilisation, which it still sees as its main rival for world dominion. The `New Imperium` finds its strength in the weakness of all those it seeks to control.

The `New Imperium` has spread conflict and disorder trying to rule secretly and indirectly by means of artificially contrived puppet regimes, everywhere disrupting the natural hierarchical order within and between divergent ethnic groups. In other words, an extraneous power has everywhere prevented the emergence of what we would call the natural `pecking order` within and between contiguous ethnic groups. In fact, in very many instances, a reversal of the ancient `pecking order` has been found necessary by the world's new secret rulers.

It is this interference in the relationships of ethnic groups, which has created an age of conflict and tragedy which is without precedent in all of world history. A process of unfolding history having as its culmination the decline of the West and a century of unprecedented conflict can be traced to many causes.

But central to all is the corrupting principle of USURY - money traded as a commodity and lent at interest - as a component of the world's monetary system.

Thus, our age of conflict, like a spiders web, has many aspects, some of them beyond our powers of understanding, but that which we need and can use is the knowledge that the peoples of the West have only themselves to blame for the plight in which they and the rest of the world find themselves today; for they have themselves created the morally unhygienic conditions in which evil flourishes as never before. The prediction and promise of the Old Testament prophets has been fulfilled:

The nation of lenders has become `the head` and all the others, blind to usury's hidden peril, `the tail.”

In Part Four, we will examine the `Diagram` in detail.

Comments to :

Further reading:

David Livingstone:

FrtizSpringmeier :

Victor Marsden : The Protocols Of Zion

Ivor Benson : The Zionist Factor



0 #1 Guy Reid Brown 2009-08-14 19:18
Hello Philip – Part 3 simply confirms what I already suspected, that you are the most important writer we have today. A grand, sweeping statement I know, but you are saying exactly the right things at the right time with the right (extraordinary) detail and context.

Nothing to add to this as it is so comprehensive except that, after reading Part 3 twice through and mulling it over in bed (hard to sleep!) I thought of this little formulation re: So[censored]m:

‘So[censored]m is the Trojan Horse. Capitalism is the means of production and distribution of the Trojan Horse.’

Of course, this makes Corporate Capitalism a Trojan Horse as well, but I still think it is pretty neat!
0 #2 Philip Jones 2009-08-14 19:19
Thanks Guy;

Very kind words. What I am really trying to do is bring people to the books I read myself. This is where the depth of knowledge resides. If I could only get people to read for example, three Books : David Livingstone's `Terrorism & the Illuminati, `The Police State Road Map,` and William Carr's `Prince of This World,` then my job would have been done.

Most are kept so busy these days,(intentionally so) by work etc. running around with their heads up you know where, that they just don't have the time to read books.

I keep saying this, but web articles and videos only scratch the surface. Books are where the depth lies.

I am honoured by your kindness and hope you continue to regard me as such.


0 #3 Guy Reid Brown 2009-08-14 19:20
'Most are kept so busy these days,(intentionally so) by work etc. running around with their heads up you know where, that they just don't have the time to read books.

I keep saying this, but web articles and videos only scratch the surface. Books are where the depth lies.'

Wiser and truer words could not have not been said, my friend!
0 #4 Jonee 2009-08-14 19:20

If I take a step back and look at myself, reserving the best part of the day to read the most comprehensive and least insulting (to my intelligence) analysis of the sorry-ass state of affairs that we find ourselves in ... I guess, I can not be helped. This is so off the charts.

I just hope that we do not run into a snag when we find ourselves obliged to defend our personal little terrain. The issue can easily be put into one sentence: what happens to the good person speaking the truth, taking chances, using his abilities as best as possible, when this person is confronted with facts which undermine his personal beliefs, such as the literal existence of persons or facts? One pope put this into a great sentence, but I have to look it up. It went like "How profitable this fable of the Christ has been for us". I refer to researchers like Acharya S aka D.M. Murdock and many others. We know the bible has been tampered with several times and we know the winner writes history. Winners may write myths, too. Myths may actually be history in disguise. Meaning: it is one tough labyrinth. What do you do when someone important (ahem), on camera, pulls out a document and declares that now is the time that we should be informed that the religions and faiths known as X, Y and Z, with their corresponding main characters, have not actually come about as advertized, but all is well, here is a new one we all can get along with. Cui bono?

That first comment you received for N of E 3 may stand for hundreds of minds, hopefully many more, if not right now then soonly. All these people are getting it. Most are likely to have prepared themselves by hacking their way with a machete through the jungle of theories for years now, getting alienated in the process. Someone said (about Masonry) "Back then, occult societies protected evil, intelligent, wicked men (women are notoriously absent in this charade, but that is for another day, Philip) who were promised secret knowledge (they weren't told they would get it spoon-fed, haha). Nowadays the occult societies prevent good, moral, intelligent people from getting anywhere". Was it Jordan Maxwell? Doesn't matter.

You kind of have the "I knew it all along" bonus when the puzzle starts fitting together (after a process of years, usually), which is not entirely satisfying by any means if you ask me, and then you ask yourself sooner or later what to do about it. But first it has to click in a major way, several times. Truth is first vehemently fought, then ridiculed, then accepted as self-evident, was this Schopenhauer?
0 #5 Jonee 2009-08-14 19:21
Maybe it is indeed a prerequisite to be educated, at least in history, or it is all just names that don't mean much. Maybe the phrases from the horses' mouth alone do the trick for many newcomers. They do it for me, but that's just me. Maybe it works on regular people by just taking stock of personal experiences and observations of the general state of affairs, eventually, at the latest when their accounts are frozen and the SWAT team is driving by.
You get the "feeling", meaning, intuitively, that it actually is a perversion of the humanity and goodness in us by a minority of assholes, sooner or later one becomes somewhat cynical. It is just the stupid bimbos who are exceedingly happy, and those jokers pushing the televised mantra "Look here, don't look inside". Everyone else is just faking it over an underlying paranoid desperation ameliorated only by the constant circus and distraction. The cognitive dissonance is reaching Wagnerian dimensions, if you ask me.

We have all met assholes all our life and know that sometimes we can't call them by their real name, or else. But over time, almost all people must accumulate on their crap account a fairly high number of increasingly bothersome experiences. Whether they see their once-admired politician (for his smile, for the silver tongue), their party, their co-worker, you name it. Think back about your school system and what it did not teach you and what it did not tell you. Every time you have to deal with bureaucracy alone you get a full shot of idiocy and evil, retarded tight-assness that someone (or something) further up the chain is undoubtedly channeling, grooming, interfacing, synergizing. These people concentrate the pederasts, psychopaths and general scum, you recruit this type of personality into key positions and bingo, an asshole in front of you writing a parking ticket with glee. A minor teeny tiny one. Waterboard the assholes so they rat on all the other assholes! Scuse my frankness.

You realize this once you are outside looking in, that they are all run by infantile psychopath pretenders on TV who are run by master manipulators, and nobody calls their con game. Yet.

Looking forward to more Nexus.
0 #6 Gigas 2009-08-14 19:21
Reality as we know it is under the control of a power so evasive, manipulative and cunning, men and woman serve it without question and in most cases, hesitation. It comes to the human being in the form of a fabricated religion to empower the minds justification to accept it for what ever agenda it creates to amuse itself. And as we have seen through out our history, horrors perpertrated on other human beings is what its all about.

Look at these so called leaders like snazzy pelosi, barney franksfurter, chris dodd, tiddy kennedy, The bush gang, clintons, al gore who invented the internet and when that failed to win him a prize, he than invented global warming for his rewards.

These are the legions, the servants, the minions of that power to corrupt reality and trap the innocent and enslave those who know the truth. I see it in their faces. I know evil and evil knows I know its presence in a human being. I see it super imposed on their faces and they know I see it there. It reacts with an emotional state to get away from me or become aggresive. But I, I am as cunning as it, I will remain cool and act as if I don't see it and respond with either a smile or a wave and go on my way.

My friend, it is where ever their is power to be had over another human being. It empowers one over the other and begins its assault to conquer and destroy by subjegation and destruction, starvation and control of the minds it seeks to claim.

We live in a world so out of control and so botched by mans inability to draw itself together to fight off this evil by seeing it for what it is, that many surrender to its power of rewarding them with material things, sex and money.

Next time you see snazzy pelosi blinking those big empty eyes, remember, she is controlled by it. When you see supreme justice sotomayor flutter her eyes when speaking, she is under its control. Barney franksfurter cleaning his nails when being asked questions, he is one of them. When chris dodd looks out with that thousand yard star, he is compromised by it. My friends, the list goes on and on.

We are at war, not with mankind, but with the power of evil found where ever authority is given.
0 #7 Jean Bush 2009-08-14 19:22
Dear Philip,

This is brilliant.

When all social, moral and religious restraints are demoralized and vanquished, the resulting poverty of thought make manipulation of the mindless masses in the desired direction a guaranteed result.

The multitudes will fall for the already "fallen ones" who promise a life of freedom desguised as as slavery: that clinging willingness to follow, obey and be content with a provisional government who promises the good life, but delivers only death.

No matter how clearly you explain it, Philip, no matter how you show them the progressive and successful plans of Satan and his slobbering, drooling-in-adoration lap dogs who are already clutching at our lives, you will not reach those who are content. And contentment itself breeds that obvious and happy familiarity with the status quo who are already in thrall to their coming destruction.

You never fail us, Philip, but I can see that the coming battle will not be won with knowledge and weapons, but only God and righteousness. I can only hope we don't fail Him.


Add comment

Security code