The Nexus Of Evil : Part Two.


(A Pre-emptive Strike On Humanity)

By Philip Jones 28th July 2009






Real power is achieved when the ruling class controls the material essentials of life, granting and withholds them from the masses as if they were privileges; as George Orwell reflected:

From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations But it was also clear that an all-around increase in wealth threatened the destruction... of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motorcar or even an air-plane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. Such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance... It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another... The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. “



In this second part in the series, I will show that around the turn of the 20th Century, manufactured deep-rooted changes occurred primarily in two quite separate realms; those of money and intellect, and how this alliance formed a `Nexus Of Evil,` which in it's service of the darkest forces of magic, has in this the first decade of the 21st Century, built a global control grid around our lives. And how by using what is nothing less than sorcery disguised as `New Age Metaphysics,` it has achieved complete hegemony over money, politics, religion, the media, big business, and education. It has subverted culture, rewritten history, falsified science, and by the expert use of the dialectical trap, has manipulated and coerced humanity into abject acquiescence and compliance, and is now preparing to deliver it's final blow which will plunge our world into a global conflagration of hitherto unimagined ferocity.


The precursors to this are the current financial crisis and quite probably, the expected `Swine flu` outbreak, which will, if informed forecasts and predictions are correct, open up the `Quarantine Camps,`[7] for those citizens who refuse the jab, and cause untold suffering for those who don't.


The Storm Centre.


So, continuing on, let us begin with an examination of the great change which took place in the world of money. It is highly significant that during the first years of the 20th century, a phenomenon appeared, that was to remain a conspicuous feature of the ensuing age of conflict, namely the concentration camp, a symbol of an expanded savagery in which civilians were joined with soldiers in the front line of every major conflict.


Towards the end of the 19th century, money began to acquire a new role and meaning in human affairs as economics began to prevail over politics. The two need to be clearly distinguished as sources of value, motivation and control at the elite level of leadership. Politics in its pure uncorrupted form, is a social function concerned with the welfare of a community, long-term as well as short-term, in which the requirements of economics, although always important, play only a supportive or secondary role.


Economic thinking, a mere department of political thinking, is concerned exclusively with the requirements of economic prosperity and progress. It assumes automatically that whatever is good for business is good for the community as a whole, an attitude of mind that excludes virtually all other considerations, and which today, to the detriment of humankind, can be witnessed to be the primary consideration for all governments.


What happened towards the end of the 19th century was, therefore, not a sudden occurrence; rather, it should be seen as a crucial stage, having been reached in a process which had continued slowly during most of the preceding century. Not only did the Anglo-Boer War signal the beginning of the end of the British Empire, it also marked the beginning of the end of national financial sovereignties across the Western world, a process that would culminate in the 1930s, when the `great` American pioneering families, headed by J.P. Morgan, were finally squeezed out of their dominating position on Wall Street.

In the relationship between politics and high finance, there subsisted a very complex state of affairs until shortly before the commencement of World War II, which can be briefly explained as follows:


There had existed for centuries within the national states of the Western world families or dynasties of bankers, like the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Montefiores, etc. who lent to governments and specialised in transactions across national frontiers, but these were never fully integrated as a system capable of controlling politics on an international scale. These concentrations of high finance, although always influential, lacked the power wholly to control the politics of the national states, but each remained an important part of a nationally oriented `constellation` of financial power.

This situation suited them well enough in the circumstances prevailing until the turn of the 20th Century. Yes, they were able to exert enormous influence, both nationally and internationally, but nothing like the almost omnipotent power they would later acquire. Paradoxically, despite the enormous lead which the Jewish banking dynasties had gained in international commerce, it was initially the `gentile` financiers with their ownership and access to the `cornucopia` of new wealth, plus their control of national politics, who first established high finance on a fully internationalized basis. The facts are supplied by Dr. Carroll Quigley:

The apex of the system was to be the Bank of International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury bonds, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by sub-sequent economic rewards in the business world.” (Tragedy and Hope).


Quigley explains further that the Rothschild's had been pre-eminent during much of the 19th century, but at the end of that century "they were being replaced by J.P. Morgan", whose central office was in New York, although it operated as if it were in London "Where it had indeed originated as George Peabody and Company in I838."


The process by which the separate national concentrations of financial power were finally absorbed into a global concentration was not completed until the 1930s. This `Coup d'Etat` of money being the prime motor which produced among other consequences, the rise of the Third Reich in Germany, the outbreak of World War II, the subsequent involvement of the United States and Japan, and the construction up of a Marxist-Leninist People's Republic of China.

Professor Quigley[6] supplies many of the facts about the final shift in the centre of gravity of financial power, and his story begins with these ominous words:


"The third stage of capitalism is of such overwhelming significance in the history of the twentieth century, and its ramifications and influences have been so subterranean and even occult, that we may be excused if we devote considerable attention to its organization and methods."


The `story,` which has been assembled from a vast accumulation of documented facts, is one of a process of change in the United States, beginning before World War I, which Wilmot Robertson was later to describe as the "dispossession of the American majority", culminating in what Quigley calls "a shift on all levels, from changing tastes in newspaper comic strips . . . to profound change in the power nexus of the 'American Establishment'"


Since the 1880s the United States had been ruled from behind the scenes by a plutocracy supported by the fortunes of the American `bloodline` families; [8] Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Mellon, Duke, Whitney, Ford, Du Pont, etc. - a power constellation with J.P. Morgan as its banking centre. This `Eastern Establishment` is described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, and European-culture-conscious", and was matched with a similar establishment on the other side of the Atlantic with Montagu Norman as its banking head. The two worked closely together and came to be known as the "Anglo- American Establishment.”


Quigley documents the "decline of J.P. Morgan itself from its deeply anonymous status as a partnership (founded in 1861) to its transformation into an incorporated public company in 1940 to its final disappearance by absorption into its chief banking subsidiary, the Guaranty Trust Company, in 1959". Quigley writes “the less obvious implication of the shift in Wall Street was the realization by the Morgan group that it no longer had the votes on the Board of Trustees of Columbia University to nominate a successor to Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, the retiring president.”


The control of American higher education had by stealth been taken out of the hands of America's `Eastern Establishment` families, described by Quigley in the paragraph above, in a manner indicating that they were not Jewish, as Wall Street subsequently fell into the hands of the international financiers like a ripe plum. The battle having been fought and won in the realm of parliamentary politics by methods which are still standard practice in the Western world; these include the financing of party politics, the manipulation of public opinion through the medium of newspapers, radio, the cinema, the book trade, etc., plus the penetration, financing and manipulation of trade union movements.


This was a take-over exercise in which America s emerging secret rulers could draw on many centuries of accumulated expertise and experience as a nation struggling to survive in dispersion. The eclipse of the power of the great American Families first took the form of taxation laws, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913 and culminating in the inheritance tax, which drove all the great family fortunes into the refuge of tax-exempt foundations. Morgan and his circle lost control of the Federal Government as one `money-and-intellect alliance` was subtly replaced by another. And the fact that a money-and-intellect alliance behaves in much the same way no matter who controls it made the change all the more difficult to detect.

The Morgan group dabbled in the politics of the radical left and lost no time in trying to get a foothold in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. But at this game they were no match for their Jewish rivals. The rival Wall Street elites may have been fuelled by the ideal and ambition of a `New World Order` but there the similarity ended.


The original American establishment, like its British opposite number, was for containing the Soviet Union and its socialist rulers, with a view to the ultimate absorption of the Russian empire into a New World Order to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire and which they, as inheritors of the Rhodes dream, would control. The other, the new Eastern Establishment. was for building up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military giant which would replace the British Empire as the foundation of a New World Order. These developments in the realm of finance capitalism and power politics came to a climax towards the end of the 1930s, coinciding with a considerable eruption all over the Western world of a social phenomenon misleadingly described as `anti-Semitism.`


In his book, `This Age Of Conflict,` Ivor Benson quotes Professor Hannah Arendt, who writes:


"Twentieth century political developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm centre of events . . . the Jewish question and anti-Semitism . . . became the catalytic agent first for the rise of the Nazi movement and the establishment of the organizational structure of the Third Reich . . . then for a world war of unparalleled ferocity. "`The Origins of Totalitarianism.`


Henry Ford, who for many years had been a fierce critic of the big bankers as being the natural enemies of private enterprise industry, was quick to draw a clear distinction between the house of Morgan, which he described as "constructive", and its rivals, whom he described as "warmongers". Morgan himself, like his opposite number in London, Montagu Norman, was known to dislike the Jews. The talks of Father Coughlin and writings of Father Denis Fahey, the frantic efforts of Charles Lindbergh to keep America out of the war, and the activities of Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts in Britain, were all reactions to the appearance of the Jewish people in "the storm centre" of 20th century politics. What all these alarming developments mean is that a highly concentrated Jewish financial power was suddenly seen to be gaining ascendancy in the West.


The English Idea:


Another crucial aspect of the prevailing political reality evident during the last decades of the l9th century must now be more closely studied - namely, the thoughts about the future that were then circulating in the English ruling classes. Cecil John Rhodes [4]was one of the most potent men of action in all of English history, but he was also a visionary and dreamer, pictured by friend and foe as a Colossus bestriding the continent of Africa. Rhodes possessed an ability to inspire activity and loyalty in others which was in every manner proverbial. In the realm of pure thought, however, the unifying and energising agent was not Rhodes but John Ruskin,[5] a one time Slade Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University, who had armed a generation of young Englishmen with an ideology of service having as its object the creation of a better and happier world. This was to be imagined as an extended application of the civilizing and humanizing concept of the British Empire; it was to be a fellowship of free and independent states held together by an abstract principle which came to be labelled the `English idea.`


The numinousity, or sense of magic, evoked by these ideas can be traced to a single cause: the ideology of a `Brave New World,` with ostensible order and welfare for all mankind, offered as a alternative, even replacement for a religious orthodoxy that had long since begun to crumble under the impact of a scientific `enlightenment;` there was in this ideal, something to restore to the existence of the intelligentsia class and its energetic scholars, a renewed sense of meaning, ideology, purpose and direction, and which moreover, quite ominously sanctified British imperial expansion and the personal advancement of all its servants.


So potent was this ideology as a secular religion that it won converts all over the Western world; even former leaders of the conquered Boers, including General Louis Botha, who was to be South Africa's first Prime Minister, and General Jan Christian Smuts, yielded to its psychic charm.

Practical measures to give effect to this political idealism took the form of a range of operations including the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the semi-secret Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the American Council on Foreign Relations, etc.


This was definitely a `White Supremacist` affair, invoking on both sides of the Atlantic a racial response. Ralph Durand, in a book about Oxford University published in 1909, wrote of "Cecil Rhodes of Oriel, the dreamer of great dreams ... Believing that the preservation of the peace of the world lay in the hands of men of Teuton blood, he made provision in his will for the founding at Oxford of scholarships that would be open to citizens of the British Empire, the German Empire and the United States"- OXFORD: ITS BUILDINGS AND GARDENS, published by Grant Richards, London.


The fatal flaw in this ideology does not belong to the art or science of politics, nor to that of high finance, but to an area of knowledge less readily accessible to exploration and discussion, namely, `Metaphysics` or more correctly, `Magic.` Quigley puts his hand on the key to that riddle: each of the central banks in the different national states, he says, "sought to dominate its government" and to "influence co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world".


What this means is that something had already gone awry in the West's national power structures – all of which had by this time incorporated a system of money creation and debt, a devilishly corrupting influence with implications of infinite complexity. Money had become progressively the measure of all things, with a `bloodline` ruling elite drawn less and less from the land and more and more from commerce and banking. Western nations had, in reality, become plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves in power with a public opinion no longer sought nor consulted as before, but which was manufactured and manipulated as required by newspapers, patronage and other `rewards in the business world.`


Just such a conversion of money into public opinion and support was accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their `gold bug` partners, having a total disregard for all or any moral considerations. Money had shown what money could do. There was, thus, an iron inevitability about the outcome of a struggle which the gentile financiers did not even see as a struggle.


An Alien High Finance.


Firmly united by long-range political aims, increasingly influenced the politics of the different national states and finally displayed the gentile financiers as managers of the new international banking structure. Those `educated` minds, conditioned by John Ruskin's secular ideology which called for a `new world` to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire, seem to have had no problems transferring their attachment and enthusiasm to the new ideology as set out by Marx and Engels.


Antony Sutton's trilogy, `Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution,` [1] Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler,[2] and Wall Street And FDR,[3] contains a vast quantity of information but is more remarkable for what it omits. For that Which is omitted is precisely what Professor Hannah Arendt correctly describes as the "catalytic agent" in the "storm centre of events", namely, the role of the Jewish people in 2Oth century power politics.


Sutton maintains there is and always was only one "Wall Street Establishment", which he blames for the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution and later Hitler's rise to power in Germany. But this over-simplification is very misleading.


During the two preceding decades Wall Street had assumed a species of split personality, one half symbolized by Morgan and the other by Warburg. It is undeniable as alleged, that `Wall Street` aiding in the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution, but in this, it was the Warburg faction (Jacob Schiff in particular) which took the initiative, with the Morgan faction eventually being on the receiving end of most if not all the adverse publicity as they belatedly tried to get in on the action. Furthermore, there is a wealth of evidence which supports the contention that it was the Morgan interests on Wall Street which supported Hitler's rise to power. But at the same , it was the internationalists who were funding the German Communist Party in those crucial elections in 1930, in which the communists gained such spectacular successes?


When one understands the prevailing dynamics of the times, it becomes elementary to recognise that the fiercest political struggles occurring all over the West during the 1930s, can now be more clearly seen as being just so many proxy battles on behalf of rival concentrations of financial power, culminating in World II and the triumph of the internationalists.


An American Fascist Coup d'Etat.


In Britain opposition to World War II came from what remained of the British end of the original Anglo-American establishment, labelled the `Cliveden set`; Cliveden being the name of the home of Lord Astor. This interpretation will also help to explain one of the most mysterious episodes in American history; a reported attempt, with the assistance of the American Legion and armed forces, to set up a `fascist ` dictatorship in America.


News of the plot was given brief front-page treatment in the NEW YORK TIMES on November 21, 1931; a congressional committee was set up to investigate the allegations; but then all news of the plot faded out of the press. Those involved included a few leading personalities in the American Legion and another organization known as Liberty League, which together seem to have undertaken to make available a force of 500,000 men. Leadership of the operation was offered to Major-General Smedley D. Butler, a much decorated military hero, but there is no real evidence that he ever agreed to go along with the plotters.


Significantly, it is exclusively the gentile power -wielders of big finance and big business who were identified as the culprits behind the scene, all linked in one way or another with J.P. Morgan: Grayson Murphy, a director of the Guaranty Company; Jackson Martindell, associated with Stone and Webster, allied to the Morgans; the DuPont Company; the Remington Arms Company, controlled by DuPont; and the Morgan-Harriman financial interests. It would seem, therefore, that the Morganite financiers and industrialists, finding themselves at last outmanoeuvred and out gunned in Wall Street, were tempted to take desperate measures against the international financiers - as had been done with some success in Italy and Germany.


As the rivalry of separate national constellations of financial power gave rise to the 19th century's scramble for colonial possessions, so the consolidation of financial power on a global basis in the 20th century required the dismantling of all the colonial empires and their replacement with innumerable new states over which the separate nations of the West would be able to exercise little or no influence..A clear distinction must, thus, be drawn between the pace and quantity of change and conflict in the world up until l939, when the new imperium was still in the process of being established, and the pace and quantity of change and conflict after the new imperium had emerged as the only real victor in World War II.


In Part Three, we will examine the part played by Western `Intellect` in the `Nexus Of Evil` and identify it's manipulation and exploitation, and the role it has subsequently played in in the furthering of the Illuminati's Luciferian Agenda.


Comments to :










6] Tragedy And Hope





0 #1 Jean Bush 2009-08-05 01:16
This is absolutely exquisite. Without this kind of background no one will be able to understand what's happening to us. There is much information out there, but it is scattered and somewhat meaningless to someone seeking the whole picture. The way you pull this information together is essential for all of us. Most don't have the time to look all over the place for clarification. Your work saves time and your flow of ideas is readily understood. Your last sentence is perfection itself. It's a blow to those who don't "get it" yet.
0 #2 R.James 2009-08-14 19:30
Thanks for your great article in two parts called Nexus of Evil. I agree with much that you say. Keep up the fight. Thanks, R. James
0 #3 Jonee 2009-08-14 19:30

absolutely brilliant, like the commenter on your blog said so well. It is after all a constant transfer of the BEST STORY WINS meme from these guys to those guys, who can keep up with it other than a real-life detective?

From what I have observed, once it has been peeled out, the compact version needs to be repeated over and over and over in as many ways as possible.

Will see how this can be brought into the Spanish-speaking world.

And yes, problems here, too, but certainly not to the degree of forced vaccinations. People are quite aware of the foulness of it all, even down to the coming vaccines and the origin of ze whoflu. Argentines have been so royally screwed over that they have good antennas. They know that a politician opens a mouth and lies come out, simple as that.

Very best regards,

0 #4 John Kaminski 2010-07-12 13:07
Thank you for this enlightened tour of 20th century politics. The only constructive criticism I can offer is that you have underplayed the effect of Jewish money on British power, which extends far back, before Disraeli and the Rothschilds fomenting the American Civil War, before even the manipulation of Jewish bankers on both sides of the American revolution, and back to the usurpation and manipulation of the British throne by Cromwell and his successors in the late 1600s with the backing of Dutch and Portuguese Jews. To insist that the worm turned in favor of the Jews at the outset of the 20th century is to neglect the capture of British power and twisting of it to speed the Jewish cooptation of Britain for some 200 years before the period you describe. This angle of focus verges too closely to the practices of Jewish spin which so poison our world today. Here's hoping that in part 3 you can more clearly recognize and describe this crucial aspect of power politics that has resulted today in a semiconscious populace trying to escape from the disease-bearing mindlock of ubiquitous Jewish spin. After all, Prince William IS a Rothschild, and this explains more than all the political analyses anyone could ever write.

Add comment

Security code